YEAR END TAX SCAMS GETTING A BIG PUSH - AND PUSH BACK - FROM UNCLE SAM

At the end of every year clients of all types (especially MD's) and advisors rush to find last minute ways to minimize the tax liability for the year. We see many plans of questionable value and legality pushed through in the last couple of weeks when due diligence is slowed by Holiday schedules and your trusted advisors' massive workloads. Here are some potential landmines to look out for. If you are being pressured into funding a plan over the holidays, make sure you know exactly what you are stepping into and have experienced counsel.

Where did this list come from? THE I.R.S.

In contrast to their many legitimate roles, foreign entities are increasingly being promoted as a means to divert income and conceal assets for taxpayers who have no real operations in a foreign country.

In addition to preferential tax regimes and protection against creditors (which is how and why I use them to protecet people every day - with full tax reporting), most tax havens also offer strict laws against disclosure of banking and business records. Generally, these nations do not have income tax treaties with the United States, and tax evasion is not considered a criminal act subject to Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties. Promoters of many abusive offshore schemes rely on the difficulty of access to records of tax haven banks, attorneys, and trustees. Furthermore, in the absence of government scrutiny, some offshore banks, attorneys, trustees, and other service providers have been known to falsify or fabricate records.

Despite being hidden or disguised, the income and assets of U.S. persons are still subject to U.S. tax. Taxpayers should be aware that abusive offshore arrangements will not produce the tax benefits advertised by their promoters and that the IRS is actively examining these types of arrangements. Furthermore, taxpayers and/or the promoters of these offshore arrangements may be subject to civil and/or criminal penalties.

Following are summaries of some identified schemes that make the IRS mad:

(Offshore) Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) - In response to efforts by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to eliminate harmful tax competition, some nations labeled as tax havens have accused OECD members of carrying on the very practices the members seek to stop. One example put forth is the ease with which nonresident aliens may do business through limited liability companies (LLCs) domiciled in the United States, in comparative anonymity. An October 2000 report by the General Accounting Office gives insight into the use of corporations as conduits for illicit funds. Abuse of anonymous corporations in the U.S. by foreigners mirrors the abuse of tax haven entities by U.S. persons.

Offshore Deferred Compensation Arrangements - Many highly compensated professional persons and business owners in the U.S. have been solicited to participate in "offshore deferred compensation plans". The U.S. taxpayer is encouraged to sever an existing employment relationship and substitute an arrangement in which the nominal employer is a foreign "employee leasing" company. The supposed result of this abusive arrangement is that the taxation of a large portion of the professional's or business owner's salary is deferred while he/she gains immediate access to the funds through loans or offshore-based credit cards. An improper deduction for employee leasing expenses is also created on the corporate tax return.

Fictitious or Overstated Invoicing - Some U.S. taxpayers have entered into schemes in which the taxpayer's U.S. business is billed by a purportedly unrelated offshore entity for goods or services (e.g., "consulting services") that are either nonexistent or overvalued.

Factoring of Accounts Receivable - A U.S. taxpayer's business may discount or "factor" its receivables to a purportedly unrelated foreign business entity. The discount or factoring fee significantly reduces U.S. tax liability, and is moved to an offshore entity where it can either be invested free of U.S. tax or repatriated for the taxpayer's use and enjoyment.

Abusive Insurance Arrangements - Some promoters have devised arrangements that are characterized as insurance arrangements, giving rise to a deduction for the U.S. taxpayer for "premiums" paid to a purportedly unrelated offshore insurance company. Often these arrangements are merely self-insurance, lacking in real transfer of risk.

Shifting of Income Using Offshore Private Annuities - Some promoters suggest that U.S. taxpayers may avoid or substantially defer tax on income streams or capital gains by exchanging property for an unsecured private annuity. In another abusive scheme an offshore private annuity is used in conjunction with an offshore variable life insurance policy as a devise to "decontrol" a foreign corporation or other entity used in an abusive sequence of transactions. As a result the promoter claims that the foreign corporation or entity is owned by the insurance policy and is not a, controlled foreign corporation, passive foreign investment company, or any entity controlled by a U.S. person whose income could be taxed in the United States to its owner.

Offshore Internet Business - For businesses conducted primarily through the internet, promoters offer "kits" which give the appearance that the business is foreign owned and operated. Transactions may be routed through offshore servers, and business receipts may be collected through offshore bank accounts or credit card merchant accounts. These schemes particularly target businesses that offer delivery of computer software and other digital products such as music, pictures, or video. They may also provide a means of operating offshore gaming activities.

Offshore Wagering - Over the last few years, gambling websites have proliferated on the Internet. Many of these virtual casinos are organized and operated from offshore locations, where the operators feel free from State and Federal interference. The operators of these activities may suggest that players in the U.S. are not subject to tax on their winnings, and may handle collections and disbursements in ways designed to facilitate avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Repatriation of Offshore Funds Using Credit Cards (such as MasterCard and VISA) issued by tax haven domiciled banks are a preferred method used by U.S. taxpayers to anonymously and covertly repatriate offshore funds that may or may not have been previously taxed. American Express cards are used in the same way but differ in that these cards are issued directly by American Express rather than by member banks.

Original link to I.R.S. - http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=106559,00.html

Estate Tax to Temporarily Expire Until Next Year - Now the Really Bad News

Given the depressed value of many real estate and investment portfolios, there has never been a more tax efficient and advantageous time to implement the right kind of estate planning, start transferring assets at their current value and improve and tune up the life insurance components of your planning, here's why:

The 45 percent tax on estates of over $3.5 million for individuals, or $7 million per couple, is scheduled to expire on Dec. 31, 2009, only to return in 2011 at a 55 percent rate for all estates of over $1 million. During 2010, estates would be taxed at the capital gains rate of 15 to 28 percent when heirs sell off more than $1.3 million in inherited assets.

Call us for help in making sure that 55% of your life's work is not lost to a system that is VOLUNTARY - that's right, I said ESTATE TAX IS VOLUNTARY. Why? Because the law allows you to structure, transfer and insure you way to ZERO estate tax liability if you are willing to put a small amount of time, money and effort into it.


See the whole story here: http://www.webcpa.com/news/Estate-Tax-Temporarily-Expire-Until-Next-Year-52743-1.html?ET=webcpa:e623:134343a:&st=email


Yours, Ike

Do You Really Need A Buy/Sell Agreement?

The post below is excerpted from the news letter of a colleague, financial advisor Steve Beatty who works with successful business owners all over the U.S. from his offices in the Las Vegas area. This edition of Steve's newsletter really deserved to be shared because it efficiently summarizes we exposures of not having a buy sell in place that can easily wipe out a business or family.

Yours, Ike

Part I

In our last issue of this Newsletter, we discussed the problems that can arise if a business continuity (buy/sell) agreement designed for one event (usually the death of a shareholder) is called upon to manage the more likely event of a shareholder’s departure during his or her lifetime. Lifetime departures may occur due to the retirement, termination, divorce or bankruptcy of an owner.

While it is true that poor design or failure to update the agreement—especially in tough economic times—can create significant problems, does that mean you and your co-owners shouldn’t have one in place? In a word, NO! The business continuity agreement may be one of the most important documents that you, as a co-owner of a closely held business, will ever sign.

For an idea of why, consider the case of Acme, a fictional company.
George Acme’s son-in-law, Tom Gardner, had worked for George for over 20 years. Tom had gradually assumed operational management and was the acting CEO. In recognition of Tom’s contribution, George had sold Tom—mostly at a low value—25 percent of the company.

Everyone expected that Tom would one day own Acme, Inc. But before that day arrived, George died and Tom's sister-in-law became the executor of George’s estate. She decided to sell George’s share of the company—at its full fair market value and for cash—either to Tom or to the highest bidder. At the time, she did not understand that no third party would acquire a majority position in a company co-owned and run by a disgruntled CEO.

Had Tom and George created a business continuity agreement that reflected their wishes about value, control and successor ownership, the business would have transferred at a fair price to the benefit of all concerned. Because they had not done so, Acme was unlikely to continue at all.

As mentioned earlier, a business continuity agreement can control the transfer of ownership in a business when a variety of events occur including: an owner’s death, permanent and total disability, termination of employment, retirement, bankruptcy, divorce, and a business dispute among the owners.

The buy/sell agreement can further require that the business or the remaining owners to purchase the departing owner's stock; or it may give an option to the business or the remaining owners to buy that ownership interest.

Lastly, it may give the departing owner the option to require the company to buy his or her ownership interest.

The agreement should establish the value of the stock, set the terms and conditions of the buyout, and give additional protection to all owners. In short, the business continuity agreement tells owners to whom they can sell, at what price and terms, and under what restrictions they can sell stock.

Advantages of a Buy/Sell Agreement.

The disadvantages of a buy/sell agreement are few if the document is well drafted and is kept updated for changes in ownership, value and other circumstances. (See Issue175.) With that in mind, the major advantages of a buy/sell agreement are:

1. Ownership in the business can be transferred only in accordance with the agreement. This benefits both the owner wishing to transfer stock and the other owner(s) wanting to acquire stock. In the first instance, the buy/sell agreement can provide a selling shareholder, or his/her estate, with a purchaser for fair value and upon terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable. For remaining owners (such as Tom), the agreement provides that any transfers of ownership must be made, or at least offered, to them. This eliminates the threat that an outside party or a co-owner's spouse or children will become owners of the business, thereby diminishing management, control and value.

2. Valuation is set not only for purposes of a sale, but also for estate tax valuation purposes. Privately owned businesses are notoriously difficult to value. Your idea of your business's value at your death may be much lower than the IRS's. If you haven't created a binding process for valuing the business, the IRS is free to impose its own determination of value. Take the initiative by designing a valuation appraisal process in your buy/sell agreement.

3. The terms and conditions of any transfer of stock, including interest rate, length of buyout period, and security can be fixed. In addition, where possible, the transfer can be funded. The agreement provides a clear estimate to a departing shareholder of how much money he or she will receive and how often. Likewise, the remaining shareholders know in advance the extent and duration of their buyout obligations. This allows both parties to plan their respective futures.

Had Tom and George created a buy/sell agreement with terms like these, a valuable business could have been transferred successfully. That transaction would have benefited Tom, George’s estate (family), Acme’s employees, customers, vendors and community.

Subsequent issues of The Exit Planning Review™ discuss all aspects of Exit Planning. The provider of this Newsletter (Steven Beatty) offers you unbiased information about what you may need to know — How To Run Your Business So You Can Leave It In Style™.

To get more info on these topics and Steve's great newsletters please contact him directly 702.804-6474 sbeatty@invest4business.com